Using Netstumbler To Measure Wi-fi Signal Strength?

Posted on 22. Aug, 2009 by admin in Answers

2

For a science project, I want to cover my router with different materials and see how that affects signal strength. I want to use NetStumbler to measure the signal strength, but I’m a little confused between the + and – things and the scale it uses.
Can someone please describe a scale I could use to go from weakest to strongest (or vice versa)?
Thank you so much for your help and Happy Thanksgiving!

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts

  1. How To Choose The Best/fast Wireless Channel?
  2. After I Use Netstumbler To Find Connections How Do I Get Windows Xp Wireless Manager To Connect Me To The Net.

2 Responses to “Using Netstumbler To Measure Wi-fi Signal Strength?”

  1. Nothingf

    22. Aug, 2009

    Absolute power of a signal is measured in wattage. The bel or decibel
    system can only describe relative power- a gain of 3 dB means your
    signal is 2 times as strong as it was before, but the dB scale doesn’t
    define where you’re starting from or what your ‘zero’ is. So, we
    specify dBm, indicating that our scale is relative to 1 milliWatt of
    power. 0 dBm = 1 mW.
    The reason you see negative values is that you’re representing small
    but positive numbers, on a logarithmic scale. In logarithms, the value
    indicated represents an exponent… for example, under a log 10 scale,
    a value of -2 represents 10 to the -2 power, which equals 0.01.
    Likewise, a negative dBm means that you’re applying a negative
    exponent in your power calculations; 0 dBm equals 1 mW of power, so
    -10 dBm equates to 0.1 mW, -20 dBm equates to 0.01 mW, and so forth.
    It’s a lot easier, and more useful in some calculations, to describe a
    weak signal as -100 dBm as opposed to 0.0000000001 mW.
    So -65 dBm is twice as strong as -68 dBm.

    Reply
  2. Funky G

    22. Aug, 2009

    Id suggest looking for some netstumbler forums.
    They are probably the DB signal ratios.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers